One of the most entrenched beliefs in K-12 education is that students are assigned where to go to school based on where they live. The zip code lottery as it’s sometimes put. Perhaps it’s so entrenched because it’s been that way for over a hundred years. Or, it could be because when it comes to school districts, students are still assigned their school by where they live.
But today, in 43 states and the District of Columbia students can choose a charter school or their assigned traditional public school. Both choices offer a tuition-free public education. And neither choice is right or wrong for all students. It depends completely on the student. I have two children, and one attends a charter school I co-founded (yes, it’s her choice!), and my other child goes to a traditional public school. Both of my kids are in schools that fit their needs best. The way it should be.
In this new K-12 landscape, school districts and charter schools need to put their focus on the customer. Being customer-centric organizations isn’t just the right thing to do, it’s the only way to grow, and maybe even stay in business in what’s becoming a wide open K-12 education marketplace. Here are some ideas to make sure to happens:
Schools, and particularly school districts, should adopt a customer-centric attitude to ensure their schools are competitive in this open market landscape. School districts should no longer assume they have a right to student enrollment because they’ve been around longer, or because it’s the way things were traditionally done.
Districts should focus on the needs of individual students by conducting research and listening to their students and families. They should forget about the notion that students need to be in traditional classrooms with 30 other students, day in and day out. They should:
Charter schools should do most of the same things, while keeping in mind that there’s a specific reason people chose to send their children there. With the growth of charter schools, some charter management organizations (CMOs) have grown larger than medium sized school districts. While this is surely good for economies of scale and for generating additional market security that comes with size, I’m not sure it’s the intent of charter law in most states. When charter schools get too big, aren’t they just school districts by another name?
This doesn’t necessarily mean charter schools shouldn’t grow – after all, if they’re successful at what they do, the market will reward them. But, remaining customer-centric, and true to their mission of providing school choice for families, should always be top of mind.
School districts and charter schools are operating during exciting but dynamic, almost volatile times. School choice is a rallying cry for charter schools and a swear word to school districts. But it doesn’t need to be this way. Both charters and districts are in great positions to meet the needs of current and future generations of students by building cultures of customer centricity in our schools.
Originally published at www.k12cbo.com on December 14, 2016.
http://www.k12cbo.com/adopting-customer-centric-focus-k-12-education/